The Leadership Mirror

Nothing has caused me or allowed me to see my own shortcomings like trying to lead others.  The longer I do it, the more I see the pitfalls of my personality, my history and my brokenness.

Note- this is not meant to be self-deprecating.

man-looking-in-mirrorI’d guess, and guess that I’m right, that this is true for most leaders.  Leadership is like a giant mirror that constantly reflects back on us.  Interestingly enough, when things go well, we (I), in our (my) abhorrent self-absorption, are (am) often tempted to believe that it is simply a reflection of our (my) gifts and talents.  When we look good, we want to see that in ourselves.  What also happens however, is that we also have the opportunity, if we’re willing to look long enough, to see our own stupidity.  We might see ourselves how others have seen us.  We might even see things that make us uncomfortable, the side of our fallenness that we’d tried to cover up with the gifts and talents God has given us.

This sucks, to say the least, but it is also a good thing.  I recognize that God has gifted me in certain ways and that the Spirit is empowering me for ministry.  However I have also observed, with a great, unfortunate clarity, on how terribly short I can fall.  I wonder if this too, isn’t a working of the Spirit.  I have recently had a couple of conversations in a somewhat short period of time; each with people that I have had the privilege of working with in ministry.  Both are gifted leaders and are able to challenge me in ways that I need to be challenged.  Both conversations left me with the reminder of my own shortcomings.

Again this isn’t self-deprecation.  These conversations didn’t drive me into depression or cause me any real emotional harm.  They simply served as a reminder; a good reminder.  Later on as I prayed the Lord brought this passage of scripture to mind:

But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.  That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships,in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong.

2 Corinthians 12:9-10

Homogeneity

Though I may grow weary of it, I am glad that we regularly ask what Christian community should look like.  How is it that we, the called out church of Jesus Christ, should live? Furthermore, how is that impacted, if at all, by the cultural context in which we currently exist?  As I am informed by the Word, Christian authors/thinkers and my own hermeneutic of culture, I of course have my own opinions on this.  Maybe we can share those another day.  At this point I’d simply like to propose a question which is related to this conversation and impacts how generations live together in the church.

Recently I’ve become curious about how homogeneity in social groupings might be both a hindrance and possibly even a tool to community building. 

Homogeneity: the quality or state of being homogeneous; of the same or a similar kind or nature.  

-Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

Like it or not; Birds of a feather do flock together and this sociological dynamic is always going to be a factor in how we live together as the church.  But how many potential categories of homogoneity/variation can exist in a given social environment?  I’m willing to offer the following six categories:

  • Ethnicity
  • Age
  • Nationality
  • Culture
  • Economics
  • Gender

I recognize that some of these overlap quite heavily and that there may even be more.  Still, for our purposes here I’m sticking with these six.  Then I’m asking, to what degree does a community need homogeneity in any of these categories to function?  What benefits would be afforded to community leaders if there were homogeneity in any percentage of these?  What benefit does diversity offer?  workplace_homogeneity

There is of course a tension in God’s Kingdom that we all live with.  Many of our communities are homogeneous in most of these categories and yet we know that the Kindom  is much larger.  At least I hope we know.  We are often entrenched in the ethnocentric circles which we’ve drawn around ourselves all the while knowing how the Church can and should be so much more diverse.

I wonder if there’s a magic number of these categories that must be homogeneous to allow for real community to take place.  Admittedly I’m playing this game with only human rules, acknowledging fully that the Father’s Kingdom can break through these categories and into our communities; homogeneity or not.  Still, if playing with this simply from a sociological perspective, would two homogeneous categories provide enough community to allow for the other four to remain diverse?  I’m sure someone out there has looked into this!

It seems to me that we have to deal with the diversity that is handed to us and/or is present in the larger social context where our churches exist.  For some churches, this means ethnic diversity, for many others it will most certainly include economic diversity.  Still, the diversity of age should exist in every one of our congregations; but sometimes doesn’t.  So as a pastor who cares deeply about the generational connections, what level of homogeneity is necessary (if any, remember this is still a question!) to make it easier for the church to step across the generational divide?

My only real thought on this is how culture may potentially be the strongest factor and most important indicator.  In social settings, we look for what we have in common; something that we mutually understand and can therefore share or discuss.  Cultural barriers can be and most likely are key factor in differences of age, nationality, ethnicity and economics.  If we as churches create common culture, one that is shared, then maybe these other factors become easier to bridge, possibly making homogeneity less of an issue.

For the Church (not just my church)

I use to get frustrated by the amount of transitioning students in our college ministry.  Students would come and students would go.  In our context I’ve had to deal with almost constant changes to our population of college students.  One contributing factor is that we’re near a junior college, which carries with it a two year time frame.  Another factor however, is that there have been many students who’ve without explanation wandered into our community for a season, before wandering right back out again.

Believe it or not; I’ve learned to live with it.  My frustrations began to change when a campus minister friend of mine helped me see the situation differently.   He challenged me to send them out as opposed to mourning their leaving.  Instead of whining about them being gone, which is my default and is admittedly selfish, I’ve learned to bless them and celebrate them as they leave. For me, that has been a game changing idea.

transitions

What I’ve come to accept is that many of them, maybe even most in some seasons, will end up living somewhere else.  Deep down we want them to graduate from college and come home; get involved with the church; teach Sunday School and tithe.  Realistically, they may find a job, or a relationship, or a mission, in a different geographic location.  The temptation, and quite honestly the usual response from the larger church, is to divest our resources because they might not be returned to our community.  This, in my opinion, is sin.

Everyone knows that young people can be flaky.  They bounce around; they move here and there; they constantly change their email address; they find new social media outlets before we’ve finished setting up our user accounts for the last one; whatever.  This is their life stage and abandoning them because of it would be like discontinuing your junior high ministry because 6th graders can’t fully control all of their body parts.  We have both explicit need and biblical reason to maintain our investments in every generation.  Though young adulthood isn’t getting any less complicated, this doesn’t excuse our absence from their lives.  

What I want to say, and what I believe, is that our investment in their lives is for the Church and not just for my church.  What we do with them now will have an impact on what God will do in them and through them in the future; and that should not be dependent on their geographic location.  We need to, sometimes at the expense of our own churches, see the bigger vision of what’s at stake here.  This is for the Kingdom; not just for our church or even smaller: for our program.  We need to keep the universal, “Big-C” Church of Jesus Christ in mind in all of this.  And who knows, down the road there may be some intangible effect in your church because of the young adult someone else invested in. 

If we don’t get this right, they will experience the church as being only interested in the success of our programs rather than the fruitfulness of their lives.  Still, if we initially sacrifice our own desires, we can ultimately benefit the student and the Kingdom of God, which is beginning to sound strangely like the Gospel.

#Scribes #literacy #attentionspans #justice

There are several groups identified in the Gospels as being in regular conflict with Jesus.  One of which, the  ”Scribes”, recently became really interesting to me for several reasons.  so I started looking into who they were and where they stood in relationship to the various Jewish sects of first century Jewish life.  As it turns out, the scribes were probably connected and incorporated into all of the sects. There would have been Pharisaic scribes, Sadducaic scribes and the like.  They became experts in both Torah law and the “traditions” which the Pharisees held so dearly to.  They also found themselves at the aid of judges, priests, rabbis and many other power players in political and religious life.  Both their popularity with the powerful and their connections with the various sects are attributed  according to scholars and historians, to one thing: they could read and write.

literacy_1_3

Reading is taken for granted in most of the western world; at least that seems to be the case in my small corner.  Thus we tend to forget that literacy has not always been the norm for the general population of a given society.  This is certainly true in the first century:  sure some folks could read, but not everybody.  Many historians believe that we shouldn’t even assume that the pharisees were literate as many of them could have, and probably did, arrive at their place of authority through verbal repetition and memorization.  By the time of the Gospels however, the scribes had apparently wiggled their way into a variety of powerful and important positions because of these simple skills.

This will immediately remind us of the opportunity that is afforded by this basic element of education.  Those who read and write aren’t guaranteed more, but they are more adequately equipped to succeed and to defend themselves against certain forms of injustice whether political, economic, religious or other.  While we must always be wary of the promises that education is akin to some form of salvation, we don’t have to look much farther back in our own history to see its importance.  It wasn’t too long ago that many African slaves were released from the oppression of slavery only to find themselves taken advantage of in the American marketplace; a multifaceted social ill which was in part due to illiteracy.  

The predominantly white suburban world that I live in is remarkably literate.  The majority of people are taught to read and write while also being afforded the opportunity to further these skills.  Yet somehow I find that a lot of young people are able to read; and yet not able to read.   People understand the basic symbols of the alphabet and how those symbols can be put together to make words.  They understand how those alphabetic symbols should form sounds and how the words can be pronounced with our mouths to produce thoughts and meaning.  However, I fear that we are dangerously close to a society in which this is the limit of it all.  If that is reading, then most of America’s Kindergartners should be considered proficient enough.  However that is not reading any more than hammering is carpentry or strumming is musicianship.  

informationliteracyMany want to attribute these problems to the education systems, which may have a role to play, but I’m more inclined to point out other societal factors.  I’m not the first person to point out the role that mass media, the internet, cellular technology and social media networks are having on this.  Though we as a society can read, we generally choose to no longer do so.  We choose Twitter over Twain and Facebook over fiction.  Steinbeck and Tolkien, not to mention the Bible, are really too long and arduous in a world of 140 character posts and #hashtags made up of jumbled words.  Then we have the inundation with audio and video messages to the point that the idea of reading for information becomes both impractical and old fashioned.  Our collective attention spans are shriveling before our eyes and its happening with horrible grammar, spelling and syntax!

This takes me back to the scribes.  This isn’t prophecy and I hope to be proven wrong; but I suspect that the next generation(s) will find themselves afforded and/or denied basic opportunities according to their ability to read, use and understand language.  Imagine having to read any sort of document that matters when all you’ve done is watch youtube videos and read misspelled tweets.  The people that can read, write and articulate their thoughts will have the upper hand in most of life’s most challenging circumstances, especially things pertaining to legal and economic matters.  Those who cannot will at best end up working for them.  

Because of my investment in this generation this concerns me for a couple of reasons.  First, literacy issues pose challenges to discipleship.  It’s difficult to promote Biblical literacy when dealing with people that can read, but can’t pay attention to what’s being read.  Second, it seems almost inevitable that this will prove to be a justice issue.  Those who find themselves on the unfortunate side of literacy will struggle socially, economically and legally.  There will be an even further divide between rich and poor, powerful and weak, with the former being given greater opportunity to take advantage of the latter.

What then should our response be?  Overhaul the education systems?  Abolish media and technology?  I’d actually be fine with both of those, but they each pose their respective problems and neither of which  are probable; certainly not by me.  Somehow we have to encourage people to read.  We have to advocate not just for literacy, but for comprehension and the use of language as a necessary skill for living.  Our discipleship of  young people needs to become contextualized to fit this growing trend while simultaneously be infused with the challenge to actually read the scripture.  Many Christians have gone before us in this same endeavor and have succeeded in both raising literacy rates and growing people in the faith; I trust that we will find ourselves following, almost strangely, in their footsteps.